In this particular day I shall
interpret a verse from the Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu, namely verse 71. In A
Source Book In Chinese Philosophy,
Wing Tsit Chan presents the verse:
“71. To know that you do not
know is the best.
To pretend to know when you do not know is a disease.
Only when one recognizes this disease as a disease can one be
free from the
disease.
The sage is free from the disease.
Because he recognizes this disease to be disease, he is free
from it.” 1
Firstly, let us discuss the
theme of the verse. The theme of the
verse revolves around sincerity about what one knows and what he does not know.
Admitting this implies humility and freedom from pretenses.
Reflecting on the lines, it centers on the right attitude towards
one’s ignorance and one’s knowledge. Being aware of one’s ignorance can really
aid one into seeing the essence of a thing.
For example, assuming on something without doing some investigation or
background check can blind a person to its truth. There are some people who tend to assume that
older people are more likely honest than the younger ones. Essentially, there is no truth in this. Advanced age is not a guarantee for
honesty. It takes right attitude to
become honest. Besides, commonly
advanced age also is used as basis for saying that one has more knowledge than
the other. Age has nothing to do with
being honest or being knowledgeable. In
this case, one loses the opportunities to explore, discover, and reflect in
order to learn more insights from many realities in life. For Lao Tzu, this is like a disease that
destroys one’s capacity to become wise.
Another way of looking at this
would be in terms of pretensions. When
one pretends to know something is like an attractive but empty cup. It is useless and meaningless. Pretensions make one anxious, because he
already has a superficial ego to fill up.
This then can result to slavery to one’s pride and selfishness. It traps
the individual into carrying unnecessary baggage that will drain him of his
chance to live a freer and lighter life.
Lao Tzu, then, proposes one to “unlearn”. This is because it is only in such
“unlearning” that one can rid himself of the blinders that he sets in his perspective
of things. Previous knowledge from
different sources of information poses a double-edged sword. Yes, it can aid in preparing one’s mind for
something, but on the other hand, it robs the spontaneous wisdom of the moment
given by Nature. In being stubborn to
stick to one’s biases, one brings himself to emptiness. He brings himself to injury, for he goes
beyond what is just necessary just to satisfy his ego. Therefore, in order to resolve this dilemma,
Lao Tzu advises one to “unlearn”. Doing this does not imply forgetting learned
things in one’s life. Rather, one must
detach himself from ignorance and pride and make himself open to new things. It is in being open and willing to learn that
one understand things.
Pretenses lead one to despair and insecurity. They are the common causes of chaos and
hatred. They bury the essential capacity
of one to free himself from lies. Nobody
is truly happy with lies. They deceive
people and lead them to misery. Lies are
short-lived. But every person has the
inherent capacity to know, learn and grow in truth. The
truth supersedes lies and sets one free. One must never stop to know and live the
truth.
A person’s tendency to prejudge something or someone acquires
illnesses rooted in conceit and narrow-mindedness. These result to misinformed choices and
decisions that lead one to failures.
When one admits sincerely what he knows and what he does not know, he is
closer to knowledge and nearer to truth.
It takes humility and sincerity to free oneself from ignorance and
conceit. It takes more miles of virtue
to heal oneself of blindness from truth. Right attitude breeds right values.
These two are the antecedents of virtues. A life of a sage just simply requires being
true to oneself. The rest of good things
follow from this.
Source:
1.
Wing Tsit Chan, “The Natural Way of Lao Tzu”, (United States: Princeton
University Press, 1963), In A Source Book In
Chinese Philosophy, 172.
No comments:
Post a Comment