In this particular day I shall
interpret a verse from the Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu, namely verse 49. In A
Source Book In Chinese Philosophy, Wing Tsit Chan presents the verse:
“49. The sage has no (fixed) personal ideas.
He regards the people’s ideas as his own.
I treat those who are good with goodness,
And I also treat those who are not good with goodness.
Thus goodness is attained.
I am honest to those who are honest,
And I am also honest to those who are not honest.
Thus honesty is attained.
The sage, in the government of his empire, has no subjective
view point.
His mind forms a harmonious whole with that of his people.
They all lend their eyes and ears, and he treats them all as infants.”
1
Firstly, let us discuss the theme of the verse. The theme of the verse
revolves around not having too much knowledge and too much desire. This is because having too much knowledge makes
one have an idea of possessing things which are unnecessary to one’s life. This unnecessary possession poses threat not
only to oneself, but also to other people.
This is because it makes others envious, and thus creates the tendency
of selfishness. This can lead to stealing and other crimes. However, if one does not have too much
knowledge and desire, then benefit for both an individual and his neighbors can
be assured. Both can live in peace and
contentment. Both can prevent oneself
from injury. This is only possible if
one appreciates what he has and starts to live simply.
Let us go over the first eight
lines in the verse.
“The sage has no (fixed) personal ideas.
He regards the people’s ideas as his own.
I treat those who are good with goodness,
And I also treat those who are not good with goodness.
Thus goodness is attained.
I am honest to those who are honest,
And I am also honest to those who are not honest.
Thus honesty is attained.”
The notion of not having too much knowledge and too much desire is
expressed in the very notion of unselfishness.
This is because knowing too much, which leads to desire, usually points
back to the self. Possessing things usually benefit the self, nothing else. But without too much knowledge and desire, one
rids the attitude of being self-centered. Since the individual has no personal take on
anything, he can be more efficient and prevents injury. He becomes efficient for he accepts and does
things not for selfish desire. He
accepts criticisms and appreciates the work of others. Having no selfishness makes one rid of the
distinction between a good or bad person.
An unselfish man treats everyone equally, no matter how crude his behavior
might be, because he is not thinking of any personal gain. People prioritize distinctions because they
think about themselves. This selfish thinking is depicted in prioritizing one’s
reputation by driving away people with bad character. Lao Tzu does not approve of such action. This is because it will only worsen the
case. Hate will only deepen, and this
will cause quarrels among people. This
results to disorder. This becomes
possible by the moment the individual prioritizes himself before anything else.
The solution therefore is to not think of oneself too much. Thinking about one’s safety is fine, but
overly thinking about it results to ruin.
By being selfless, one can see the other side of supposed to be “bad”
persons. This is because the other does
not feel repulsed by any ego. Rather, he
feels tranquil because of the welcoming presence posed by a selfless person. Being selfless makes one attain goodness and
honesty. This is because he rids himself
out of classifications and distinctions among people, treating them equally.
The sage is a person of
wisdom. He considers all with respect.
He accepts them without condition. Having no distinctions between good and bad
persons makes one do his duties more naturally.
This is because there is no presupposed distinction to fulfill. Not having the trouble to restrict one’s
action between a “good” and “bad” person makes one more effective and attuned
with his nature.
Let us continue to the remaining lines in the verse.
“The sage, in the government of his empire, has no subjective
view point.
His mind forms a harmonious whole with that of his people.
They all lend their eyes and ears, and he treats them all as infants.”
These lines represent the application of the value of not having too
much knowledge and too much desire in ruling an empire. Not having any selfish goal or interest makes
a ruler effective, for he does his work without overdoing himself. Without any desire to satisfy, an individual
can work without stress or fatigue. Much
more, he enjoys his work. This is all
because he has no selfish objective in his heart. And because he is unselfish, he can see the
different sides of a situation, making him see the real problem to solve. An unselfish ruler is not far from his
people, for he does not have grandeur or splendor in his palace. This is
because he only has what he needs. This
indirectly helps the people into realizing the value of contentment and
simplicity. All of these were made
possible by such an example posed by a selfless ruler. By being selfless, the people can see the good
will he has for the empire, thus evoking their loyalty to him.
Not having too much knowledge and too much desire can make one
appreciate his self and the possessions he has.
It prevents an individual into harming himself, for having no desire
implies not overworking. In the
political sense, an effective ruler is the one who thinks less about
himself. In this selfless way of
thinking, he becomes more efficient for he can do things naturally. He can do things naturally for he does not
worry or overwork himself over unnecessary desires. In being selfless he can address the needs of
his empire and can see the real root of the problem. A true ruler does not need an intimidating
aura to make the people follow him. All
he needs to do is to show his goodwill by living simply and in content. In this way the people will learn to be
simple and be content, which then can lead to peace and order.
Source:
1.
Wing Tsit Chan, “The Natural Way of Lao Tzu”, (United States: Princeton
University Press, 1963), In A Source Book In
Chinese Philosophy, 162.
No comments:
Post a Comment